I work, basically, in a cave (no windows), never seeing
the light of day for hours at a time so I tend to shoot at night when it
doesn't make any difference. I could grow mushrooms. Control, control, and
more control is the only way to get great results and get them repeatedly.
Many people tell me that they couldn't handle the pressure of doing jury
slides for artists. I find the best slides are a result that I get in
collaboration between myself and the artist whose work I'm shooting in a
very intense shooting session that often lasts for hours, from 2 to
sometimes up to 10-12 hours.
I shoot with a minimum of 2 lights for most 2-D work and up to 8 or 9
lights with 3-D work. I use almost exclusively strobes and occasionally
hot lights. Strobes take a little getting used to but I like the color
consistency that I get with them and the power that they produce. Pottery
I most often shoot with 3 lights and almost always use polarized light. It
does tend to make it a little warmer but not necessarily uniformly over
the color range. Reds and yellow get exaggerated. Of course these can be
corrected digitally and that's great if what you are looking for is
digital files. I would not shoot in a white tent as this masks the natural
look of the glazes which are all important for potters and ceramicists. It
gives it a white glazed over look. I know professional photographers who
do shoot this way. I can spot their slides a mile away. It does make a
shooting session go faster but it is a quality compromise. I don't like to
make those compromises and I market my work as top quality jury slides of
fine art and fine crafts, not almost top quality of fine arts and crafts.
I have done quite a few digital slides and have tried a variety of
suppliers. I have not been happy with any of them. The argument could be
made that digital slides are just good enough for jurying; however,
promoters tend to use slides for promotions unknowing that they are
digitally produced. The results are most often poor.
Digital slides, in my opinion, will never stand up to the comparison
between first generation slide film and digital slides. They are not sharp
and this is not a function of PS sharpening but the film recorder
technology or lack of current technology and in my opinion will never be
upgraded. The colors are inconsistent, blacks are often weak. I could go
on and I find that making a great digital print and copying them as a
piece of 2-d art onto camera original 35mm slide film of your choice is
much, much, much better. When I go to a slide jury I can usually pick out
the digital slides. They are like 2nd or 3rd generation dupes.
But don't get me wrong. I love digital. I just bought the D2X and am
amazed with what it can do and the quality of it's images. I use it for
proofing every 3-D job that I do to get the lighting down pat. And of
course I use it when someone just wants digital files and no film. I also
have an Nikon 4500 which I bought, mistakenly, for a studio backup digital
and for a personal point and shoot. I find it more difficult to use than
either my D1X or D2X so I rarely use it now and may sell it now that I
have the new D2X.
The responsibility that artists give me when they send or bring in
their work to my studio is not taken lightly. I not only have the
responsibility to show the work in a manner that will let others
understand it in a short period of time, I also have the physical
responsibility to handle the work while it is in my studio and in shipment
back to them so they don't get damaged. We all know how expensive good art
is. However, things do happen.
I was recently shooting four marvelous deerskin handbags made by a
prominent Native American artist. Leather can be a difficult medium to
shoot. It absorbs light more than most fiber, it will shift colors
unexpectedly due to the dyes used and at times it's more delicate than it
appears.
As I was examining the bags I noticed that the front flap did not lie
dead center over the body of the bag. So in my best photo perfectionist
style, I used professional duck tape to hold the front flap centered over
the body of the bag which is behind the flap. I shot this job over three
days; Friday, Saturday and Sunday. When I received the film back from the
lab on Monday and saw that the slides were perfect, I started to remove
the tape holding the flaps in position. Well not so quick. The tape pulled
the front layer of the delicate leather off and ruined two of the bags and
left residue on the other two which could not be removed with any
solvents. These are $500 bags, not your ordinary handbag. When I told the
artist what was going on he told me that he couldn't even use an easy
release tape like painters masking tape as it would pucker up the leather.
Well needless to say, this was a free photo session which includes not
only the film but a bunch of additional digital work that needed to be
done. In other words I can not charge when the product is damaged. There
is no negotiation. My reputation is at stake here. He's going to give me
the ruined bags though and the better news is that he will continue to use
me as the quality of my photography exceeds anything that he had seen
before of his work. This was certainly an expensive learning experience.